just nate – code is poetry, life is code

“I am a nobody”

11.04.2009 (4:27 pm) – Filed under: I am awesome, philosophy

On April 5, 2009, as a part of the LDS General Conference which I referenced in my last post, Elder Neil L. Andersen, a newly ordained member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles in the LDS church, spoke in the Sunday morning session in his first address as an apostle.

Before I say any more about this, let me first explain a little bit to you about the LDS church. The church was founded by a young man named Joseph Smith. Joseph had been seeking truth, and claimed that in his search he had received a vision of God the Father and the risen Lord, Jesus Christ. Joseph says that Jesus told him none of the churches on the earth at the time were true, and he (Joseph) become a prophet and the Lord’s instrument for the true church’s “restoration” to the earth. Following in that vein, the church has since had a prophet and twelve apostles. The church claims that the main calling of an apostle is to stand as a “special witness of Christ.” Digging deeper, one comes to understand that what this actually means is that the church claims that the apostles are like the apostles of old: they can be a witness of Christ because they have actually seen him and actually spoken with him face to face.

I do not mean to question the sincerity of these men. My purpose is to analyze what they said and see if it is in keeping with reason.

From Elder Andersen’s address (I am transcribing from a video [see it - he spoke Sunday AM] of the proceedings, any transcription errors are my own):

Just after my call as a general authority sixteen years ago, in a stake conference where I accompanied President Packer, he said something I have not forgotten. As he addressed the congregation, he said: “I know who I am.” Then after a pause he added, “I’m a nobody.” He then turned to me, sitting on the stand behind him, and he said, “and Brother Andersen, you are a nobody, too.” Then he added these words: “If you ever forget it, the Lord will remind you of it instantly, and it won’t be pleasant.”

These are stunning words. I can’t believe they came from a man who claims to be inspirational and enlightened. They reek of a barbaric, ugly, medieval thinking. It seems to me that any intelligent person, on reading these words, should feel a strong sense of indignation and outrage.

From my last post you should be able to tell that I had no plans to watch conference. However, a friend of mine was watching conference with his family, and was sending me occasional texts about what he was hearing, and so I went back to see parts of it that I had missed. When I met with this and other mystical, revolting concepts, I was surprised to know that so many of my peers and family members are so very taken with such an egregious doctrine. I was even more surprised to know that I once was caught in the trap myself.

Some of my close associates at work were talking about conference on Monday morning, only 24 hours after these pernicious words had been delivered to the world for mass consumption. And, to my surprise, they were talking about this exact talk – and praising Elder Andersen for his humility and wisdom. I told them that I am a “somebody” and that nothing any of them ever says will ever make me believe that I am a nobody. That certainly didn’t stop them from trying!

“When you’re out in the middle of the ocean, doesn’t it make you feel small and insignificant?” I was asked. Of course not! It makes me feel triumphant. It makes me rejoice in the power of a man’s mind. Man, who has not evolved to exist at sea, can exist at sea nonetheless, by reason of his mind. “My son could pull out a small weed, but I could pull out an entire tree. Don’t you think that, by comparison, my son is nothing?” No! I think it is amazing that man can build a machine that can carry hundreds of trees and create wooden planks out of them to build our houses. I think that the age of brute force work is ending, all because of man’s capacity of thought. This surely doesn’t say to me that man is nothing, that I am a nobody, or anything of the sort. “In the scope of the entire galaxy, compared to all that space, and all the stuff we don’t even know about yet, don’t you think it makes man look pretty insignificant?” No, no, no, NO. It makes each one of us so much MORE significant and so much MORE of a somebody. We haven’t yet found any life as intelligent as we. Every human life is incredibly precious. The faculty of the human brain is astounding! Look around you! Look at your world and tell me I’m insignificant. I don’t believe it. Look at the formless void of space through my eyes, and you will not see an engulfing, dark abyss. You will see potential, development, prosperity, and the future. “God can move a mountain just by thinking about it. Don’t you think that by comparison to God we are all nothing?” First, prove that God can do that. Second, if you want to see how to move mountains, do some research on the Kennecott copper mine. Third, LDS doctrine states that we are supposed to become like God. If I am to be a god, when do I stop believing I’m a “nobody” and start to be “significant” like God? Or is God also a nobody? What did God do that is so great, according to you guys? Well, create the earth, create us, and put us on the earth. It’s an argument in my favor. Man creates and innovates, just like your God.

I am not a nobody. If you really believe that you are a nobody, well, I guess that probably makes it true.

“You’ve never felt how small you were when looking at the ocean.”
“Never. Nor looking at the planets. Nor at mountain peaks. Nor at the Grand Canyon. Why should I? When I look at the ocean, I feel the greatness of man. I think of man’s magnificent capacity that created this ship to conquer all that senseless space. When I look at mountain peaks, I think of tunnels and dynamite. When I look at the planets, I think of airplanes.” -Gail Wynand speaking to Dominique Francon in The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand, written before the space program had been created.

“It’s interesting to speculate on the reasons that make men so anxious to debase themselves. As in that idea of feeling small before nature. It’s not a bromide, it’s practically an institution. Have you noticed how self-righteous a man sounds when he tells you about it? Look, he seems to say, I’m so glad to be a pygmy, that’s how virtuous I am. Have you heard with what delight people quote some great celebrity who’s proclaimed that he’s not so great when he looks at Niagara Falls? It’s as if they were smacking their lips in sheer glee that their best is dust before the brute force of an earthquake. As if they were sprawling on all fours, rubbing their foreheads in the mud to the majesty of a hurricane. But that’s not the spirit that leashed fire, steam, electricity, that crossed oceans in sailing sloops, that built airplanes and dams . . . and skyscrapers. What is it they fear? What is it they hate so much, those who love to crawl? And why?”

2 Responses to ““I am a nobody””

  1. Trogdor Says:

    Oh come on, Nate! He is speaking spiritually, not physically. He is saying that we have a long way to go to get where God is and that we should acknowledge all the help God gives us to progress.

    Your example of being alone in the ocean is striking. Your triumph certainly is fitting.

    Now compare that triumph with God sitting in the middle of outer space channeling natural forces to create solar systems. That picture reminds me of Carl Sagan’s book “Pale Blue Dot.”

    Furthermore, he isn’t saying mankind is nothing, but that our personal contribution to our salvation is like a 4-year old giving his father $2 toward the father’s purchase of a $100 bike for the child.

    A programming analogy might be good too. Linux is an amazing triumph of man’s ingenuity. It is the product of an immense quantity of hard work and many brilliant minds. So what if you, Nate, make a tweak to Ubuntu and re-brand and release the operating system as NateOS. Is everyone going to flock to download your version of Ubuntu that gives no credit to Ubuntu and all the credit to Nate? You are nobody.

    But I digress, because the physical interpretation is silly. Consider Christ’s command to eat his flesh and drink his blood to be worthy of salvation (John 6:54-56 ~ http://scriptures.lds.org/en/john/6/54-56). Is Christ advocating cannibalism?

    No! Chill, Nate! There is a more logical interpretation of Elder Packers’s statement.

  2. nate Says:

    Ken,

    First off, it is very nice to hear someone approach this topic with intelligence. I’ve spoken to a few people about it who became, well, is frantic the right word?

    I see where you’re coming from, Ken, but I dislike the idea that, if I become a god, my contribution will be like a 4-year old paying $2 for the purchase of her bike (and I remember disliking that analogy when I saw that church video). I’m sure you are already aware that we don’t just pop into perfection when we die, assuming there even is a god and assuming that, in all the religions that have ever existed or ever will exist, yours is the magical “one true religion.” The progression just continues and could still take eons.

    I think the concept of an Atonement is kind of nice on the surface, but there’s actually an egregious evil lurking in the core of the doctrine. Christ did not need a savior, as far as I can tell. Who knows what the history of our own heavenly father is, but I’ve gleaned that the LDS faith supports the idea that he was a savior in some other universe for his own Father. So we are constantly indebted to him, all through the end of time? Personally, I hate being in debt. Imagine having a perpetual mortgage hanging over your head, that you are not capable of ever paying off. That’s not glory! I’ll have none of it! On the other hand, if we are going to pay off the debt, and we have an eternity to progress, why even take the debt in the first place? It’s very similar to my car-buying mentality: I’ve always purchased in cash.

    If I am to become like God, channeling energy throughout the Universe (which is a cool idea, Ken), I’m not going to do it by borrowing things from people, just like God himself doesn’t borrow power from anyone else. It’s a progression that has to happen personally for every man.

    That’s why I think your Linux analogy is an empty shell. Linux is a community project, so of course I can’t take it and call it my own. Salvation is a personal, one-soul-at-a-time journey. I can’t live your life well for you.

    And I think it’s funny that you should bring up Christ’s admonition to eat his flesh and drink his blood. There are much crazier things in the Bible, and some churches (ahem – Catholic!) actually believe that the bread and wine are magically converted to his flesh and blood. Transubstantiation, baby! But the real reason I think it’s funny is because it’s just another example of the same concept: what is stopping the leaders of your church from just saying what they mean? What stopped Christ from sitting down and really explaining what your church calls “the sacrament”? Or, if he did explain it, why didn’t the apostles of old write it down? Why do I have to interpret this saying of Elder Packer to be something “spiritual”?

    I think Rand’s expression is quite apt: “As if they were sprawling on all fours, rubbing their foreheads in the mud to the majesty of a hurricane.” I don’t remember ever seeing you do it, but I have seen that as a pervasive theme among many religious people, and that is what is upsetting to me.

Leave a Comment
(All comments are moderated before they appear on the site.)